405
<
He Ccal Smith has informed. Branston, in a acto rec? Dec 20
that that he actuals wrote m
was "sumfel
Cus
9
is
The
Meet
follows: A despatcts about the Chan-ti-lum, the no deported
'party, will go out next trail, I think,
(
<
for unght mention if any action is laken
that
mit that is all":
Mr. Herbert
Dastatonce
MWH Dec 30
again I looked at my dan In
dates, a Isrally believe that W. Lowcock newn Laid
On Thinking this.
arr
anything to my about his letter, on
The statements of W. H.
22
July 28.
m
Made in May 29x
The contradicty
May 29 Dermition Jul
Istre ale al
1. Jumwich, when I talked no shop, & have
No Meollution.
he
of deing him at
assy
this time about thin
was out Items for a month (13.390) £ Twas abroad Erfen Je returned.
I think the interview I was thinking of when I wrote my minute must have Her cach, in Junes when de first arrione; hathin gopiffed abah all into Attentry matters: a dumat he wanted to make the fovenian for having upresentul him as supporting Sin A. Kennedy's Mockade Proposals & I Ruch Seiten off.
may possibly spoke ofthe interview with Mr Hennehy & Imixere cof the two; for at that time he concl not have known that
when the statement
M
Frans find in Council
Shen, 297
to
were made which his letter to Keswich is meant to contradict. Partainl his alluding
Lav no vreollection
to his letter
Hennefy
of
, or to those statements of
al
This Papen
any subsegment time, har
Heps bank until
7
the return frome circulation
the despatele (not with this huddle)
on which munter.
witter
respecting the alterations made
in the report of
the Governa's speech.
Iolid not altogether like the dup
d I put in aride
a
in did not
pup till shad time of mite intheng This I have now dona
Satisfine with in
Aur Jam werten
Mis not every
ran suljus to that satisfactail.
Am 2011
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.